Showing posts with label court case. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court case. Show all posts

सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 4 साल के अनुभव वाले उम्मीदवारों को पात्रता से छुट देने के विरुद चल मामले व पीजीटी में शोर्टलिस्टिंग से भर्ती से बाहर उम्मीदवारों द्वारा दायर मामले में 06-08-2013 को हुई सुनवाई में पारित आदेश ये है -- Dalip


ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7820/2013
SHIVANI GUPTA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With prayer for interim relief and office report )
WITH SLP(C) NO. 10128 of 2013
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 12629 of 2013
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 8593-8594 of 2013
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 9456-9460 of 2013
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)

Date: 06/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. John Mathew,Adv.
Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.
Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv.
Mr. John Mathew,Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary,Adv.
Ms.Preetika Dwivedi,Adv.
Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG
Ms. Usha Reddy,Adv.
Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv.
Mr. Varun Punia,Adv.
Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv.
Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 have filed counter affidavit,

भर्ती बोर्ड व पीजीटी/पीआरटी रिजल्ट स्टे वाले मामले में हाईकोर्ट ने 06-08-2013 को हुई सुनवाई में ये आदेश दिया है --dalip



Vijay Kumar Bansal vs State of Haryana and others

Present: Mr. Inder Pal Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with
Mr. D.S Nalwa, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
.
Mr. H.N Mehtani, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for respondents no. 6 to 10.
Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate.
* * * *
The affidavit was required to be filed by the State Government within a period of one week of the last order i.e 15.7.2013. It has been filed only on 2.8.2013 on

Court Case decision of JBT trs appointed in 2000 ROSHAN LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA CWP 23173 OF 2010


PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
CASE STATUS INFORMATION SYSTEM

Case Status :  DISPOSED

Status of          CIVIL WRIT PETITION   23173        of    2010    
ROSHAN LAL & ORS                 Vs.                  STATE OF HARYANA & ORS
Pet's Adv.     :   RAJBIR SEHRAWAT                   
Date of Disposal :     Thursday, September 27, 2012
Last Listed On :     Thursday, September 27, 2012
List Type :  Ordinary     

FIR No. :   NO FIR DETAILS AVAILABLE / NOT A CRIMINAL CASE
    

Category :  GOVT SERVICE (HY)-sb     

Bench for Next Hearing Dt :  MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,---,---     Bench Sl. No : 208     

Bench for Last Hearing Dt :  MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,---,---     Bench Sl. No : 214     


CONNECTED APPLICATION (S)
No Connected Application.
    


CONNECTED MATTER (S)

   CWP     2377   of   2011
Case Updated on:   Thursday, September 27, 2012 

    
                       C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT 
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision:- 27.09.2012
C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010
Roshan Lal and others ....Petitioner(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)
C.W.P.No.2377 of 2011
Satyawan and others ....Petitioner(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)
***
CORAM:-   HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
***
Present:- Mr.Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate,
for the petitioners in CWP No.23173 of 2010.
Mr.C.R.Dahiya, Advocate,
for the petitioners in CWP No.2377 of 2011.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.D.A.G., Haryana.
***
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
By this order, I propose to dispose of two writ petitions i.e.
C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 and C.W.P.No.2377 of 2011 as common questions
of facts and law are involved therein.
For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from CWP
No.23173 of 2010.   C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -2-
Petitioners have approached this Court asserting that they were
appointed as JBT Teachers in pursuance to the selection made in the year
2000 and that the JBT Teachers who were appointed in the subsequent
batches in pursuance to the selection held in the years 2001 and 2004, have
already been promoted to the posts of Masters/Mistresses according to the
statutory Rules. Petitioners have been denied the said benefit only on the
ground that their selection is under challenge before the Supreme Court and
the matter has been entrusted by the Supreme Court to the Central Bureau of
Investigation (for short 'CBI') for determining the genuineness of the two
lists, which are purported to be available on record, as to which one should
be given effect to. This, counsel for the petitioners, contends cannot be
made a ground for not considering the claim of the petitioners for promotion
especially when till date the petitioners formed the cadre of JBT Teachers,
they are continuing as such. He places reliance upon the order passed by
this Court in CWP No.10970 of 2009 Anil Kumar and others vs. State of
Haryana and others, decided on 10.11.2010 (Annexure P-6) and prays for
issuance of the same directions.
Counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, contends that
the claim as made by the petitioners in the present writ petition cannot be
accepted in the light of the observations made by the Supreme Court in the
selection of JBT Teachers of the year 2000 which is pending before it. He
contends that it has been observed by the Supreme Court in its order while
entrusting the investigation to the CBI that on the result of the enquiry
would depend the fate of these two sets of persons. It is only one set of
persons which would be found to be genuine and hence entitled to hold theC.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -3-
posts of teachers and the persons from list, if found to be false, shall have to
make room for the others. He, on this basis, contends that the claim of the
petitioners for promotion cannot be granted. Accordingly, he prays for
dismissal of the writ petitions.
I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the
parties and with their assistance have gone through the records of the case.
As is apparent from the assertions made by the counsel for the
parties, petitioners belong to the 2000 Batch of selected JBT Teachers.
They are serving with the respondents since the date of their appointment.
Subsequent to the selection and appointment of the petitioners, selection of
JBT Teachers has been made in the years 2001 and 2004, of which selected
and appointed candidates, have already been given promotion on the posts
of Masters/Mistresses. Petitioners are being denied promotion merely on
the ground that the matter pertaining to their selection is under challenge
and pending consideration before the Supreme Court wherein a CBI enquiry
has been marked. Nothing has been placed on record which would entitle
the respondents for non-consideration of the claim of the petitioners for
promotion. That apart, whether the list from which the petitioners have
been appointed or the other list is a genuine list, has to be determined and at
this stage, it cannot be said that the petitioners have been selected wrongly
and there is nothing on record which would suggest that their appointment
and selection are not in consonance with law as of now.
In the light of the above and taking these aspects into
consideration, this Court in Anil Kumar's case (supra) had disposed of the
writ petition with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case ofC.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -4-
the petitioners for promotion in terms of the eligibility criteria laid down
within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of
the order. The stand of the respondents in the present writ petition also
cannot be accepted for non-consideration of the claim of the petitioners.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, the
present writ petitions are disposed of with directions to the respondents to
consider the claim of the petitioners for promotion to the posts of
Masters/Mistresses in accordance with law, within a period of four months
from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
September  27,  2012    ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH )
poonam             JUDGE
  

HT ki promotion na lene walo ko bhi ACP mila,court case copy


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
1) C.O.C.P.No.3001 of 2011 (O&M)
Ved Parkash and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Abhay Singh Yadav and another
...Respondents
2) C.O.C.P.No.3002 of 2011 (O&M)
Pushpa Devi and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Abhay Singh Yadav and another
...Respondents
3) C.O.C.P.No.3003 of 2011 (O&M)
Mahinder Singh Mehla and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Abhay Singh Yadav and another
...Respondents
4) C.O.C.P.No.3004 of 2011 (O&M)
Jai Gopal and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Abhay Singh Yadav and another
...Respondents
5) C.O.C.P.No.3005 of 2011 (O&M)

पीटीआइ की हाईकोर्ट ने नियुक्ति रद की, पांच माह में नई भर्ती करने का आदेश++PTI court order

पंजाब एवं हरियाणा हाई कोर्ट ने मंगलवार को महत्वपूर्ण फैसले में 1983 पीटीआइ की नियुक्ति को अवैध करार देते हुए रद कर दिया। नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया में कर्मचारी चयन आयोग की भूमिका पर भी सवाल उठे हैं। साथ ही आयोग को पांच माह के भीतर नियमों के तहत नए सिरे से भर्ती प्रक्रिया शुरू करने का आदेश भी दिया। हाई कोर्ट के जस्टिस एजी मसीह ने एक साथ 68 याचिकाओं पर चार माह पूर्व रिजर्व रखे गए फैसले को सुनाते हुए यह आदेश जारी किया। राज्य कर्मचारी चयन आयोग ने 10 अप्रैल 2010 को फाइनल लिस्ट जारी करते हुए ये नियुक्तियां की थीं। कोर्ट ने कहा कि नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया के दौरान साक्षात्कार होल्ड करवाने वाले आयोग की सेलेक्शन कमेटी के सदस्यों द्वारा कार्यवाही में शामिल न होना नकारात्मक छवि को उजागर करता है। दस्तावेज खुलासा करते हैं कि नियुक्तियां निर्धारित नियमों के तहत नहीं हुई और इन्हें गैरकानूनी कहना गलत नहीं है। खंडपीठ ने कमीशन की कार्यप्रणाली पर सवाल उठाते यहां तक कहा कि बहुसदस्यीय कमीशन होने के बाद भी कार्यप्रणाली से ऐसा लगता है कि यह सब एक व्यक्ति के कहने से चल रहा है। कोर्ट ने कमीशन के चेयरमैन व सदस्यों पर भी तल्ख टिप्पणी की
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : 11.9.2012.
CWP No. 15656 of 2010
Sanjeev Kumar and others
…… Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
….. Respondent(s)
CWP No. 11695 of 2010
Kailash Chander and others
…… Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another
….. Respondent(s)
CWP No. 2613 of 2011
Tej Singh and others
…… Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
….. Respondent(s)
CWP No. 7067 of 2010
Krishan Kumar and others
…… Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another
….. Respondent(s)
CWP No. 8154 of 2010
Dharampal and another
…… Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another

अंग्रेजी लेक्चरर के आवेदकों ने दायर की याचिका

हरियाणा लोक सेवा आयोग द्वारा की गई लेक्चरर (स्कूल कैडर) की भर्तियों से असंतुष्ट उम्मीदवारों ने कोर्ट का सहारा लेना शुरू कर दिया है। इतिहास लेक्चरर (स्कूल कैडर) के बाद अब अंग्रेजी लेक्चरर (स्कूल कैडर) भर्ती मामले में भी पंजाब एवं हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट में कुछ उम्मीदवारों ने याचिका दायर की है। मामले की अगली सुनवाई 22 नवंबर को होगी। हरियाणा लोक सेवा आयोग द्वारा जारी किए गए इतिहास (स्कूल कैडर) के परिणाम में काफी गड़बड़ी उम्मीदवारों ने जताई थी। इसके तहत 26 दिसंबर 2010 को स्क्रीनिंग टेस्ट हुआ था, जिसका परिणाम 31 दिसंबर 2010 आया। एक जून 2012 को इसका फाइनल रिजल्ट घोषित किया गया। एक जून को घोषित अंग्रेजी लेक्चरर (स्कूल कैडर) के फाइनल रिजल्ट पर भी उम्मीदवारों ने सवाल किए थे। इसमें एससी कैटेगरी का रोल नंबर 5335 और भूतपूर्व सैनिक कैटेगरी के 5270 का फाइनल चयन किया गया था जबकि यह दोनों रोल नंबर लिखित परीक्षा में अयोग्य ठहराए गए थे। 3834, 3962, 4287, 4838, 5767, 6356 रोल भूतपूर्व सैनिक के आश्रित हैं और इनका चयन फाइनल सूची में कर दिया गया जबकि 23 भूतपूर्व सैनिक लिखित परीक्षा में योग्य

adhoc service & seniority list mamla-Court decision


CWP No. 3114 of 2012 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 3114 of 2012
Date of Decision : February 21, 2012
Kalawanti Thakral and others
PETITIONERS ....
Vs.
State of Haryana and another
RESPONDENTS .....
CORAM  : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
*   *   *
Present : Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
*   *   *
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)
Petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer that
the ad-hoc service rendered by them prior to the regularization is not
being counted towards the seniority despite their initial selection
being in accordance with the statutory Rules. They contend that the
claim made by them in their representations, which have been
appended as Annexure P-6 (Colly), is based upon a Division Bench
judgment of this Court passed in CWP No. 2409 of 2008 titled as
Vijay Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided CWP No. 3114 of 2012 2
on 18.12.2008, wherein similarly placed employees of the same
department have been held entitled to the benefit of counting the adhoc service towards seniority for promotion to the post of Lecturer.
Petitioners contend that unless the claim of the petitioners is decided

शिक्षक भर्ती में शामिल हो सकेंगे टेट के फर्स्ट लेवल में पास बीएड धारी

जोधपुर.आरटेट के फर्स्ट लेवल में पास बीएड डिग्रीधारक अब तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा में शामिल हो सकेंगे। राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट ने शनिवार को इस संबंध में आदेश जारी किए। न्यायाधीश गोपालकृष्ण व्यास ने कहा कि योग्यता के बावजूद केवल एक तारीख के बाद किसी योग्य व्यक्ति को अयोग्य घोषित करना उचित नहीं है। इस मामले में 17 मई को बहस पूरी हो गई थी, लेकिन कोर्ट ने फैसला सुरक्षित रख लिया था। बहस में कोर्ट ने एनसीटीई, राज्य सरकार तथा माध्यमिक शिक्षा बोर्ड की दलीलें खारिज कर दी थीं।
मामले को लेकर वीराराम व अन्य ने याचिकाएं दायर की थीं। इन्होंने न्यायालय को बताया था कि शिक्षा का अधिकार अधिनियम 2009 तथा एनसीटीई के नियमों के अनुसार टेट के फस्र्ट लेवल में उत्तीर्ण बीएड डिग्रीधारी तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा- 2012 में कक्षा 1 से 5 तक अध्यापन कराने के योग्य हैं, जबकि राज्य सरकार ने 1 जनवरी 2012 तक ही इन अभ्यर्थियों को इस भर्ती परीक्षा के योग्य माना है। 
चूंकि, शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के आवेदन इस साल फरवरी के अंत में मांगे गए थे, ऐसे में टेट के प्रथम स्तर में पास बीएड डिग्रीधारक अभ्यर्थी अयोग्य घोषित हो गए। राज्य सरकार की ओर से अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता जीआर पूनिया, एनसीटीई के अधिवक्ता कुलदीप माथुर व बोर्ड के अधिवक्ता राकेश अरोड़ा ने सरकार के आदेश को

guest tr contract letter case no cwp 7121 of 2010


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No. 7121 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 20, 2012
ARUN KUMAR
....... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
.... RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
PRESENT: Mr. GP Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Narender Hooda, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Haryana.
RANJAN GOGOI, C.J. (Oral)
This Public Interest Litigation has been filed seeking
directions from the Court for appointment of adequate teachers
in the Government Primary Schools and Government Middle
Schools named in the writ petition. According to the petitioner,
there is a shortage of JBT Teachers in the said schools and
particularly after coming into force of the Right of Children to
Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to
as 'the Act'), the student-teacher ratio in the schools in question
has drastically fallen in comparison to what has been prescribed
under the Act. Hence the writ petition seeks the directions earlier
noticed.
On the strength of several orders passed by the Court
Civil Writ Petition No. 7121 of 2010 2
from time to time, particularly the order dated 12.3.2012, the
Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government
of Haryana, School Education Department has filed an affidavit
in Court today giving the details of the number of JBT Teachers
required to be appointed in the State under the Act; the number
of sanctioned posts of JBT Teachers; the shortfall; the number of
Teachers actually working and the vacancies available. The
above figures which have been compiled in the form of a chart
mentioned in para-6 of the affidavit indicates that 1189 posts of
JBT Teachers are required to be sanctioned and 10414 posts out
of the sanctioned posts are vacant. Insofar as the additional
vacancies are concerned, in the affidavit filed it has been stated
that the said posts will be included in the Annual Plan 2012-13
for the Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan and would be submitted to the
Government of India for its approval as the financial liability on
the said account is to be shared between the Central
Government and the State Government. In the affidavit filed, it
has further been stated that on receiving the necessary
approval from the Government of India, the posts will be filled
up by a process of fresh recruitment. Insofar as the vacant
posts (10414 numbers) are concerned, it has been stated that
recruitment against 544 posts of JBT Urdu Teachers is being
undertaken separately and a requisition has been sent to the
Haryana School Teachers Selection Board for filling up the
remaining 9870 posts. In para-10 of the affidavit, it has been
stated that on the basis of the discussions held with the
Haryana School Teachers Selection Board a tentative schedule
Civil Writ Petition No. 7121 of 2010 3
has been worked out for filling up 9870 posts. According to the
said schedule, commencing with the advertisement and ending
with the sending of recommendations to the Government, a
total of 322 days (tentatively) are required for completion of the
process by the Board. In the affidavit filed it has been further
stated that 1685 surplus Teachers have been identified in 1058
schools throughout the State and the process of deployment of
such Teachers is already under process.
The affidavit dated 19.3.2012 of the Financial
Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of
Haryana, School Education Department filed in Court today
indicates the roadmap that the State has drawn for itself for
filling up the required posts of JBT Teachers so as to conform to
the provisions of the Act. Reading the affidavit of the Principal
Secretary, the Court finds that the State is committed to initiate
and complete the process of creation of posts and filling up the
same (1189 numbers); the process of adjustment of 1685
surplus Teachers and also the process of appointment against
9870 vacant posts of JBT Teachers.
In view of the above, we do not think it would be
necessary for us to continue to monitor the actions of the State
any further. On the contrary, we deem it appropriate to close
the writ petition by directing the State of Haryana to initiate and
complete the necessary action in terms of the averments made
in the affidavit dated 19.3.2012 of the Financial Commissioner
and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, School
Education Department and to adhere to the various time
Civil Writ Petition No. 7121 of 2010 4
schedules mentioned in the said affidavit. We also make it clear
that no major departure from the schedule set out in the
affidavit or the plan of action contemplated therein will be made
by the State and any such departure will be viewed by this Court
as a violation of the present order.
The Public Interest Litigation stands closed in terms
of the above directions.
( RANJAN GOGOI )
CHIEF JUSTICE
March 20, 2012 ( MAHESH GROVER )
Kang JUDGE
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\


RTI se apni Answer-Sheet dekh skte h-Dalip bisnoi

State Information Commission ne ye order diya tha ki koi bhi applicant RTI se apni Answer-Sheet dekh skta h, Mamla HC me gya,SIC k pks me faisla hua, HPSC order k khilaf SCourt chali gai, Aur ab sbse hairani wali bat suniye aur es SC order me pdiye ki khud SIC ki aur se mamle ki Pairvi k liye koi pes nahi hua jiska ntija ye hua ki HC Order pr SC ne tb tk k liye STAY de diya jb tk ki es Case ka Final Decision nahi ho jata, Baki ki baat aap khud hi smj gye honge. Agar ye case HPSC har jata h to Public Appointments me kya kuchh badlav aa skte h,aap jante ho. Kash koi Yuva ya Sangh es case ko SC me dumdar trike se lad ske kyoki es case se ITIHAS bnaya ja skta h,pura INDIA es mamle k Decision se benefit utha skega.

ITEM NO. 53 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13261/2011
(From the judgement and order dated 25/03/2011 in LPA No.579/2011
of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)

See Also

Education News Haryana topic wise detail.