Vijay Kumar Bansal vs State of Haryana and others
Present: Mr. Inder Pal Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with
Mr. D.S Nalwa, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
.
Mr. H.N Mehtani, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for respondents no. 6 to 10.
Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate.
* * * *
The affidavit was required to be filed by the State Government within a period of one week of the last order i.e 15.7.2013. It has been filed only on 2.8.2013 on the anvil of the hearing, which did not give the petitioner time to respond within one week, as has been granted in the last order. The response of the petitioner be now filed on or before 12.8.2013. The records, if any, pertaining to the consultation with the State Public Service Commission about fixing the strength as observed in the second Administrative Reforms Commission Report and the decision taken thereon
be produced before this Court on the next date.
List on 13.8.2013.
( SANJAY KISHAN KAUL )
CHIEF JUSTICE
( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH )
JUDGEAugust 06 2013www.teacherharyana.blogspot.com (Recruitment , vacancy , job , news)
No comments:
Post a Comment
thanks for your valuable comment