मात्र सिग्नेचर के आधार पर दोषी/फर्जी घोषित जेबीटी टीचर्स को हाईकोर्ट ने दी अग्रिम जमानत--
Crl. Misc. No.M-34034 of 2015
Ajmer Singh and another vs State of Haryana
Present : Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr.
Advocate with Mr. Shranav
Katyal, Advocate
for the
petitioners.
***
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners
have falsely been implicated in the case, whereas, their specimen
signatures were obtained after a gap of four years from the date of
examination, which took place in the year, 2009 and there is a possibility
that the signatures might differ with passage of time. Learned counsel also
submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required as
the case is based on documentary evidence and they have joined the
departmental proceedings and have also given their specimen signatures.
Learned counsel also submits that nothing is to be recovered from the
petitioners. All documents are either in the custody of the police or with the
department. Some of the accused persons have been released on interim
anticipatory bail by the lower Court and the case of the present petitioners
is on better footing viz-a-viz those persons, who have been released on
interim bail. The petitioners are ready to join investigation.
Notice of motion for 20.11.2015.
Meanwhile, the petitioners are directed to join investigation and
in case they join investigation and in the event of their arrest, they shall be
released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. They
shall join the investigation as and when required by the Arresting Officer.
in case they join investigation and in the event of their arrest, they shall be
released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. They
shall join the investigation as and when required by the Arresting Officer.
They shall also comply with the conditions as envisaged under Section 438
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which are as under :-
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which are as under :-
(i) that the petitioners shall make
themselves available
for
interrogation before arresting officer
as and when
required;
themselves available
for
interrogation before arresting officer
as and when
required;
(ii) that the petitioners shall not,directly
or indirectly, make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade
him from
disclosing such facts to the court
or to any
police officer;
or indirectly, make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade
him from
disclosing such facts to the court
or to any
police officer;
(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave
India without the
prior permission
of the Court.
India without the
prior permission
of the Court.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
October 06, 2015
JUDGE
October 06, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment
thanks for your valuable comment