Result on SMS and Email
Posted On : 2011-07-16
A new feature has been added to Kurukshetra University web site for delivery of result by SMS or Email or both. University will inform through web site expected date of declaration of result of a particular class. Immediately after that students of that class will be able to register their mobile numbers and/or Email IDs on web site against their Roll Numbers. Upon actual declaration of result all registered mobile numbers will get the result automatically. Emails will also be sent automatically.
click here for registration
format type for registration
Register here your Mobile Number and / or Email ID for Delivery of your Result
Class : Please select class B.Com. Part I - Annual System
Student Name :
Father Name :
Roll Number :
Registration No. : (NA if not available)
Result Required by : SMS Email Both
Mobile Number :
Email ID :
Security Number :
Important Notice : Your mobile number might be registered with 'NATIONAL DO NOT CALL REGISTRY' Database. You will not receive SMS in that case. Those who would like to register/de-register their request for NDNC registry may dial 1909 or SMS to 1909 with keywords 'START DND' for registration and 'STOP DND' for de-registration. You can check your registration status from http://ndncregistry.gov.in
Mobile Number and Email ID registration (for result delivery on Mobile/Email) available for :-
Class Name Result Expected
B.Com. Part I - Annual System 30-07-2011
Punjab TET Question Paper
QUESTION PAPER FOR
PUNJAB STATE TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST
(Examination Held on July 03, 2011)
Deputation Requirement Implementation of Saakshar Bharat Mission
Deputation Requirement
Implementation of Saakshar Bharat Mission
1. The department intends to set up a team at district headquarters (ZPs), to implement Saakshar Bharat Programme in Jind, Kaithal, Karnal, Fatehabad, Hisar districts. The team will be on deputation to district hadquarters for one year. Requirement is as follows:
2. Lecturers/masters
3. Qualification-Post graduate having working knowledge of computer
4. Interested staff-lecturers/masters may kindly apply to DGSE on email at slmaharyana@gmail.com. Kindly attach detailed biodata/curriculam vitae along with the deputation request.
5. Offer open till 20th July 2011.
6. For details of the Saakshar Bharat Mission visit website www.SaaksharBharat.nic.in
Director Secondary Education
Implementation of Saakshar Bharat Mission
1. The department intends to set up a team at district headquarters (ZPs), to implement Saakshar Bharat Programme in Jind, Kaithal, Karnal, Fatehabad, Hisar districts. The team will be on deputation to district hadquarters for one year. Requirement is as follows:
2. Lecturers/masters
3. Qualification-Post graduate having working knowledge of computer
4. Interested staff-lecturers/masters may kindly apply to DGSE on email at slmaharyana@gmail.com. Kindly attach detailed biodata/curriculam vitae along with the deputation request.
5. Offer open till 20th July 2011.
6. For details of the Saakshar Bharat Mission visit website www.SaaksharBharat.nic.in
Director Secondary Education
court case copy- case dismissed B.Ed is not equivalant to JBT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
Date of Decision: July 7, 2011
Puran Chand and others
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana,
for the respondents.
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes
M.M. KUMAR, J.
1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution,
the short prayer made is that Note (ii) in Appendix ‘B’ of the Haryana
Primary Education (Group-C) District Cadre Service Rules, 1994
(for brevity, ‘the Rules’) may be declared ultra vires of Articles 14
and 16 of the Constitution because it permits the candidate with
higher qualification such as B.A., B.Sc. and B.Ed. to be considered
for appointment to the post of Junior Basic Trained Teachers. A consequential
prayer has also been made for quashing advertisement
dated 22.12.1994 (P-3), which stipulate in accordance with Note (ii)
that if adequate number of candidates possessing the qualification
of J.B.T. Teachers were not available then the posts could be filled
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
up from those who have qualification of B.A., B.Ed. or B.Sc. B.Ed.
The aforesaid clause reads as under:-
“2) xxx xxx xxx
Note:- i) xxx xxx xxx
ii) In case of non-availability of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers the candidates having
higher qualifications such as B.A. B.Ed. or
B.Sc. B.Ed. or its equivalent may be considered
for the posts of Junior Basic
Trained teachers but on selection such
persons shall have no right to claim the
benefit of any higher pay scales or salary
other than the pay scales of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers as the Government
may fix from time to time simply on the
basis of higher qualification. In case any
Basic Trained Teacher acquired higher
qualification including B.A. B.Ed. or B.Sc.
B.Ed. or its equivalent after selection or
joining the service he or she shall not be
allowed any higher pay scales or salary
simply on the basis of acquisition of such
qualification. The letter No. 5056-F.R.-II/
57/5600, dated 23rd July, 1957 issued by
the Finance Department of composite
State of Punjab shall have no effect
whatsoever.”
2
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners joined the
course of Diploma in Education (Two-Year Course), which is popularly
known as J.B.T. Course, in the Government run institutes. At
the time of filing of the writ petition in the year 1995, the petitioners
passed the Part-I examination of the said course and were pursuing
their final year of J.B.T. course, which was to be completed by the
end of May 1995.
3. The petitioners have claimed that earlier the conditions
of service of Junior Basic Trained Teachers in the Education Department,
Haryana were governed by the rules known as ‘the Punjab
Education Service Class-III (School Cadre) Rules, 1955. Under the
said rules, the prescribed qualification for the post of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers was as under:
“(i) Matric (Full) with English as one of the subjects.
(ii) Pass in two years J.B.T./Diploma in Education Training
Course from the Haryana Education Department
or equivalent qualification recognised by the Haryana
Education Department.”
4. The petitioners have further claimed that by the end of
1994 Session of J.B.T. course, there were about 1200 J.B.T. trained
candidates available whereas there were more than 3900 posts of
Junior Basic Trained Teachers were lying vacant. The petitioners
further anticipated that after completion of their course, approximately
1700 more J.B.T. trained candidates were to be available.
5. On 16.9.1994, the State of Haryana under proviso to Article
309 of the Constitution framed ‘the Rules’. Rule 7 of ‘the Rules’
prescribes that no person would be appointed to any post in Service
unless he is in possession of qualifications and experience specified
3
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
in column 3 of Appendix B of the Rules in the case of direct recruitment
and those specified in column 4 of the said Appendix in the
case of appointment other than by direct recruitment. The relevant
entry of Appendix-B reads thus:
“ APPENDIX-B
Sr.
No.
Designation
of
posts
Academic qualification and
experience, if any, for direct
recruitment.
Academic
qualification
and experience,
if any,
for appointment
other
than by direct
recruitment
1. 2. 3. 4.
1. Junior
Basic
Trained
Teachers
(i) Matriculation from the
Board of School Education,
Haryana or its equivalent as
recognised by the Board of
School Education, Haryana,
and
xxx xxx
(ii) Passed two years Junior
Basic Training Course or
Diploma in Education Training
Course from Haryana
Education Department or
its equivalent recognised by
the Haryana Government.
(iii) Knowledge of Hindi
upto Matric standard.
Note-
(i) Preference will be given to candidates who
possess knowledge of Urdu upto Middle Standard
for such posts of Junior Basic Trained
Teachers who may be required to teach Urdu
or in Urdu.
(ii) In case of non-availability of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers the candidates having
4
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
higher qualifications such as B.A. or B.Sc.
B.Ed., may be considered for the posts of Junior
Basic Trained Teachers but on selection
such persons shall have no right to claim the
benefit of any higher pay scales or salary
other than the pay scales of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers as the Government may fix
from time to time simply on the basis of higher
qualifications. In case any basic Trained
Teacher requires higher qualification including
B.A. or B.Sc. B.Ed. after selection or joining the
service, he or she shall not be allowed any
higher pay scales or salary simply on the basis
of acquisition of such qualifications. The letter
No. 5056-FR-II/57/5600, dated 23rd July, 1957,
issued by the Finance Department of composite
State of Punjab shall have no effect whatsoever.
Note:Professional Training Diploma Certificate
awarded by any State Board or University
other than Haryana Education Department will
be recognised only if these Diploma or Certificates
have been recognised by the Haryana
Government.”
6. On 22.12.1994, the Subordinate Services Selection
Board, Haryana, issued an advertisement inviting applications for
filling up 5160 posts of J.B.T. Teachers (School Cadre) in the pay
5
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
scale of 1200-2040. The last date for receipt of application was
6.1.1995. As noticed in the opening para of the judgment it has
been stipulated in the said advertisement that that if adequate
number of candidates possessing the qualification of J.B.T. were not
available then the posts could be filled up from those who have
qualification of B.A., B.Ed. or B.Sc. B.Ed. (P-3).
7. In the backdrop of aforementioned factual position, the
petitioners have filed the instant petition with the grievance that by
virtue of Note (ii) in Appendix-B, against the post of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers, an attempt has been made to equate two unequals
as equal. However, it is an admitted fact that on the cut-off
date i.e. 6.1.1995, the petitioners were not having the minimum
academic qualification of passing of two years Junior Basic Training
Course or Diploma in Education Training Course from Haryana Education
Department or its equivalent recognised by the State of Haryana.
8. In the written statement filed by the respondents, a preliminary
objection has been raised that the petitioners did not have
locus standi to challenge the constitutional validity of Note (ii) because
they are yet to acquire the qualification of J.B.T. course in order
to become eligible for appointment. It is specifically pleaded
that the petitioners lacked requisite qualification on the cut-off date
i.e. 6.1.1995, which was the last date of receipt of application form.
They were still undergoing Junior Basic Training course. Therefore,
they cannot feel aggrieved and no relief could be given to them.
9. The case was called out yesterday i.e. 6.7.2011 and we
deferred the hearing for today. Again no one has put in appearance
on behalf of the petitioners. However, for the respondents Mr.
6
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
R.K.S. Brar, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, has appeared
and we have heard the learned State counsel.
10. It is well settled that if a person lacks qualification to be
eligible for appointment to a post then he is not permitted to challenge
the selection process because in such a situation no effective
relief could be granted to him. Accordingly, he would not have any
locus standi. In Jeet Singh and another v. State of Punjab, 1979 (1)
SLR 604, the question fell for consideration of Hon’ble the Supreme
Court. In para 8 of the judgment it has been held that those petitioners
lacked locus standi to file a petition because they were not
qualified for promotion and they did not have any right for promotion
prior to the selected candidate nor they could succeed in their
claim. Similar principles have been echoed in the case of R.K. Jain
v. Union of India, (1993) 4 SCC 119. In that case challenge was
made to the appointment of the President of CGAT. Initially he was
appointed as Judicial Member in 1982 and in 1991 he was given appointment
as Senior Vice-President of CGAT. Thereafter, in pursuance
of directions issued by Hon’ble the Supreme Court he was appointed
as President of CGAT. His appointment was challenged on
the ground that as per the convention a sitting or retired Judge of
Hon’ble the Supreme Court is appointed as President of CGAT in
consultation with Chief Justice of India and the aforesaid convention
has been totally disregarded. It has been held by Hon’ble the Supreme
Court that a third party, which was not even a candidate, has
no locus standi to challenge the appointment of any person. Accordingly,
we are of the view that the writ petition cannot be maintained
by those who are yet to acquire the qualification of J.B.T. and
become eligible for appointment to the post of Junior Basic Training
7
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
teachers by the last date fixed for receipt of applications. Therefore,
the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on this short ground.
Even otherwise, a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Manjit Singh
v. State of Punjab and others (C.W.P. No. 451 of 2008, decided on
5.2.2010) has now taken the view that higher qualification of B.A.
B.Sc. or B.Ed. for appointment to the post of Junior Basic Training
Teachers is no bar (C.f. Full Bench judgment in the case of Som Dutt
v. State of Punjab, 1983 (3) SLR 141). It is further appropriate to
mention that vide notification dated 28.2.2003, ‘the Rules’ have
been amended and Note (ii) from Appendix ‘B’ has been deleted.
11. For all the reasons mentioned above, this petition fails
and the same is dismissed.
(M.M. KUMAR)
JUDGE
(GURDEV SINGH)
July 7, 2011 JUDGE
PKapoor
8
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
Date of Decision: July 7, 2011
Puran Chand and others
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana,
for the respondents.
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes
M.M. KUMAR, J.
1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution,
the short prayer made is that Note (ii) in Appendix ‘B’ of the Haryana
Primary Education (Group-C) District Cadre Service Rules, 1994
(for brevity, ‘the Rules’) may be declared ultra vires of Articles 14
and 16 of the Constitution because it permits the candidate with
higher qualification such as B.A., B.Sc. and B.Ed. to be considered
for appointment to the post of Junior Basic Trained Teachers. A consequential
prayer has also been made for quashing advertisement
dated 22.12.1994 (P-3), which stipulate in accordance with Note (ii)
that if adequate number of candidates possessing the qualification
of J.B.T. Teachers were not available then the posts could be filled
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
up from those who have qualification of B.A., B.Ed. or B.Sc. B.Ed.
The aforesaid clause reads as under:-
“2) xxx xxx xxx
Note:- i) xxx xxx xxx
ii) In case of non-availability of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers the candidates having
higher qualifications such as B.A. B.Ed. or
B.Sc. B.Ed. or its equivalent may be considered
for the posts of Junior Basic
Trained teachers but on selection such
persons shall have no right to claim the
benefit of any higher pay scales or salary
other than the pay scales of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers as the Government
may fix from time to time simply on the
basis of higher qualification. In case any
Basic Trained Teacher acquired higher
qualification including B.A. B.Ed. or B.Sc.
B.Ed. or its equivalent after selection or
joining the service he or she shall not be
allowed any higher pay scales or salary
simply on the basis of acquisition of such
qualification. The letter No. 5056-F.R.-II/
57/5600, dated 23rd July, 1957 issued by
the Finance Department of composite
State of Punjab shall have no effect
whatsoever.”
2
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners joined the
course of Diploma in Education (Two-Year Course), which is popularly
known as J.B.T. Course, in the Government run institutes. At
the time of filing of the writ petition in the year 1995, the petitioners
passed the Part-I examination of the said course and were pursuing
their final year of J.B.T. course, which was to be completed by the
end of May 1995.
3. The petitioners have claimed that earlier the conditions
of service of Junior Basic Trained Teachers in the Education Department,
Haryana were governed by the rules known as ‘the Punjab
Education Service Class-III (School Cadre) Rules, 1955. Under the
said rules, the prescribed qualification for the post of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers was as under:
“(i) Matric (Full) with English as one of the subjects.
(ii) Pass in two years J.B.T./Diploma in Education Training
Course from the Haryana Education Department
or equivalent qualification recognised by the Haryana
Education Department.”
4. The petitioners have further claimed that by the end of
1994 Session of J.B.T. course, there were about 1200 J.B.T. trained
candidates available whereas there were more than 3900 posts of
Junior Basic Trained Teachers were lying vacant. The petitioners
further anticipated that after completion of their course, approximately
1700 more J.B.T. trained candidates were to be available.
5. On 16.9.1994, the State of Haryana under proviso to Article
309 of the Constitution framed ‘the Rules’. Rule 7 of ‘the Rules’
prescribes that no person would be appointed to any post in Service
unless he is in possession of qualifications and experience specified
3
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
in column 3 of Appendix B of the Rules in the case of direct recruitment
and those specified in column 4 of the said Appendix in the
case of appointment other than by direct recruitment. The relevant
entry of Appendix-B reads thus:
“ APPENDIX-B
Sr.
No.
Designation
of
posts
Academic qualification and
experience, if any, for direct
recruitment.
Academic
qualification
and experience,
if any,
for appointment
other
than by direct
recruitment
1. 2. 3. 4.
1. Junior
Basic
Trained
Teachers
(i) Matriculation from the
Board of School Education,
Haryana or its equivalent as
recognised by the Board of
School Education, Haryana,
and
xxx xxx
(ii) Passed two years Junior
Basic Training Course or
Diploma in Education Training
Course from Haryana
Education Department or
its equivalent recognised by
the Haryana Government.
(iii) Knowledge of Hindi
upto Matric standard.
Note-
(i) Preference will be given to candidates who
possess knowledge of Urdu upto Middle Standard
for such posts of Junior Basic Trained
Teachers who may be required to teach Urdu
or in Urdu.
(ii) In case of non-availability of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers the candidates having
4
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
higher qualifications such as B.A. or B.Sc.
B.Ed., may be considered for the posts of Junior
Basic Trained Teachers but on selection
such persons shall have no right to claim the
benefit of any higher pay scales or salary
other than the pay scales of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers as the Government may fix
from time to time simply on the basis of higher
qualifications. In case any basic Trained
Teacher requires higher qualification including
B.A. or B.Sc. B.Ed. after selection or joining the
service, he or she shall not be allowed any
higher pay scales or salary simply on the basis
of acquisition of such qualifications. The letter
No. 5056-FR-II/57/5600, dated 23rd July, 1957,
issued by the Finance Department of composite
State of Punjab shall have no effect whatsoever.
Note:Professional Training Diploma Certificate
awarded by any State Board or University
other than Haryana Education Department will
be recognised only if these Diploma or Certificates
have been recognised by the Haryana
Government.”
6. On 22.12.1994, the Subordinate Services Selection
Board, Haryana, issued an advertisement inviting applications for
filling up 5160 posts of J.B.T. Teachers (School Cadre) in the pay
5
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
scale of 1200-2040. The last date for receipt of application was
6.1.1995. As noticed in the opening para of the judgment it has
been stipulated in the said advertisement that that if adequate
number of candidates possessing the qualification of J.B.T. were not
available then the posts could be filled up from those who have
qualification of B.A., B.Ed. or B.Sc. B.Ed. (P-3).
7. In the backdrop of aforementioned factual position, the
petitioners have filed the instant petition with the grievance that by
virtue of Note (ii) in Appendix-B, against the post of Junior Basic
Trained Teachers, an attempt has been made to equate two unequals
as equal. However, it is an admitted fact that on the cut-off
date i.e. 6.1.1995, the petitioners were not having the minimum
academic qualification of passing of two years Junior Basic Training
Course or Diploma in Education Training Course from Haryana Education
Department or its equivalent recognised by the State of Haryana.
8. In the written statement filed by the respondents, a preliminary
objection has been raised that the petitioners did not have
locus standi to challenge the constitutional validity of Note (ii) because
they are yet to acquire the qualification of J.B.T. course in order
to become eligible for appointment. It is specifically pleaded
that the petitioners lacked requisite qualification on the cut-off date
i.e. 6.1.1995, which was the last date of receipt of application form.
They were still undergoing Junior Basic Training course. Therefore,
they cannot feel aggrieved and no relief could be given to them.
9. The case was called out yesterday i.e. 6.7.2011 and we
deferred the hearing for today. Again no one has put in appearance
on behalf of the petitioners. However, for the respondents Mr.
6
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
R.K.S. Brar, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, has appeared
and we have heard the learned State counsel.
10. It is well settled that if a person lacks qualification to be
eligible for appointment to a post then he is not permitted to challenge
the selection process because in such a situation no effective
relief could be granted to him. Accordingly, he would not have any
locus standi. In Jeet Singh and another v. State of Punjab, 1979 (1)
SLR 604, the question fell for consideration of Hon’ble the Supreme
Court. In para 8 of the judgment it has been held that those petitioners
lacked locus standi to file a petition because they were not
qualified for promotion and they did not have any right for promotion
prior to the selected candidate nor they could succeed in their
claim. Similar principles have been echoed in the case of R.K. Jain
v. Union of India, (1993) 4 SCC 119. In that case challenge was
made to the appointment of the President of CGAT. Initially he was
appointed as Judicial Member in 1982 and in 1991 he was given appointment
as Senior Vice-President of CGAT. Thereafter, in pursuance
of directions issued by Hon’ble the Supreme Court he was appointed
as President of CGAT. His appointment was challenged on
the ground that as per the convention a sitting or retired Judge of
Hon’ble the Supreme Court is appointed as President of CGAT in
consultation with Chief Justice of India and the aforesaid convention
has been totally disregarded. It has been held by Hon’ble the Supreme
Court that a third party, which was not even a candidate, has
no locus standi to challenge the appointment of any person. Accordingly,
we are of the view that the writ petition cannot be maintained
by those who are yet to acquire the qualification of J.B.T. and
become eligible for appointment to the post of Junior Basic Training
7
CWP No. 1046 of 1995 (O&M)
teachers by the last date fixed for receipt of applications. Therefore,
the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on this short ground.
Even otherwise, a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Manjit Singh
v. State of Punjab and others (C.W.P. No. 451 of 2008, decided on
5.2.2010) has now taken the view that higher qualification of B.A.
B.Sc. or B.Ed. for appointment to the post of Junior Basic Training
Teachers is no bar (C.f. Full Bench judgment in the case of Som Dutt
v. State of Punjab, 1983 (3) SLR 141). It is further appropriate to
mention that vide notification dated 28.2.2003, ‘the Rules’ have
been amended and Note (ii) from Appendix ‘B’ has been deleted.
11. For all the reasons mentioned above, this petition fails
and the same is dismissed.
(M.M. KUMAR)
JUDGE
(GURDEV SINGH)
July 7, 2011 JUDGE
PKapoor
8
टीजीटी आर्ट्स का इंतजार खत्म, 228 को जल्द मिलेगी नौकरी
हमीरपुर . हिमाचल अधीनस्थ सेवाएं चयन बोर्ड की 2002 में हुई छंटनी परीक्षा में उत्तीर्ण घोषित टीजीटी आर्ट्स के अभ्यर्थियों को शीघ्र नियुक्ति मिल जाएगी। वजह यह है कि इनके इंटरव्यू को शुरू करने के लिए पिछले कई माह से लटकी फाइल क्लीयर हो गई है। सरकार ने इनके इंटरव्यू कॉल करने के आदेश दे दिए हैं।
काबिलेगौर है कि टीजीटी की तीनों श्रेणियों के तकरीबन 700 पदों को भरने का प्रोसेस वर्ष 2002 में शुरू हुआ था और सरकार बदलने के बाद यह अधर में ही लटक गया था। बाद में हाइकोर्ट के आदेश पर इनकी नियुक्ति प्रोसेस को जारी रखने का आदेश हुआ था, अब तक इस श्रेणी में नॉन मेडिकल और मेडिकल के तकरीबन 500 अभ्यर्थियों को नियुक्ति मिल चुकी है। लेकिन ऑर्ट्स ग्रुप की नियुक्ति का मामला इनके रिकॉर्ड को लेकर लटक गया था। इनका सारा रिकॉर्ड विजिलेंस ने हाइकोर्ट में जमा करवा रखा था। संबंधित रिकॉर्ड एसएसएसबी को वापस आ गया है और अब इंटरव्यू अगस्त माह में शुरू हो सकते हैं।
क्या थी वजह
टीजीटी आर्ट्स की यह नियुक्तियां इस लिए इतनी लंबित हो गई हैं, क्योंकि नॉन मेडिकल के इंटरव्यू भी हो गए थे। उन्हें केवल नियुक्ति आदेश जारी होने थे, जबकि आर्ट्स श्रेणी की केवल छंटनी प्रक्रिया का परिणाम ही निकला था, जो अभ्यर्थी पास आउट हुए थे, इंटरव्यू के लिए कॉल किया जाना था। सरकार बदलने पर 2003 में इन सारी नियुक्तियों का प्रोसेस बंद कर दिया था। तब सरकार बदलने पर एसएसएसबी में विजिलेंस का बड़ा छापा पड़ा था और लंबे समय तक यह जांच जारी रही। कांग्रेस की सरकार बदलने के बाद फिर से भाजपा की सरकार आई और पात्र अभ्यर्थियों ने हाइकोर्ट में इस दौरान याचिका दायर की थी कि उनकी नियुक्तियां की जाएं, जिस पर यह सारा प्रोसेस फिर से शुरू हुआ था। कुछ माह पहले हाइकोर्ट ने आर्ट्स श्रेणी में छंटनी प्रक्रिया में पास अभ्यर्थियों को इंटरव्यू को बुलाने के आदेश दिए थे, लेकिन बोर्ड ने इस प्रोसेस से संबंधित रिकॉर्ड उनके पास नहीं होने की बात कही थी। जिस पर विजिलेंस को पत्र लिखा गया था। विजिलेंस का संबंधित रिकॉर्ड हाईकोर्ट में होने की बात कही थी। इस प्रक्रिया में रिकॉर्ड को लेने के लिए कुछ माह लगे।
अभी क्या है असमंजस
यह नियुक्तियां अनुबंध पर होंगी या नियमित आधार पर। इस पर अभी असमंजस बनी हुई है। हालांकि पहले की नियुक्तियां स्थाई आधार पर करने के हाइकोर्ट ने आदेश दिए थे। वजह यह है कि 2002 के विज्ञापन के आधार पर इन सब नियुक्तियों को नियमित आधार पर करने की बात कही गई थी। यदि यह नियुक्तियां उसी आधार पर होती हैं, तो संबंधित अभ्यर्थियों को पेंशन सुविधा भी हासिल होगी और राज्य सरकार के अन्य पुराने कर्मचारियों की तरह तमाम सुविधाएं मिलेंगी। बोर्ड अभी अनुबंध आधार पर ही इन नियुक्तियों के प्रोसेस को पूरा करने वाला है।
बोर्ड के सचिव विनोद कुमार ने बताया कि यह नियुक्तियां अनुबंध आधार पर ही होंगी, क्योंकि पहले की नियुक्तियां भी इसी आधार पर हुई हैं जबकि बोर्ड के चेयरमैन जेके चौहान का कहना है कि इस असमंजस को लेकर सरकार को फिर से एक पत्र लिखा गया है। इसमें कहा गया है कि वर्ष 2002 की यह नियुक्तियां नियमित रूप में होने का प्रोसेस शुरू किया गया था, लेकिन अब सरकार बताए कि इन्हें किस आधार पर किया जाना है। दो -तीन दिनों में स्थिति साफ हो जाएगी, लेकिन उन्होंने बताया कि इंटरव्यू प्रोसेस शुरू करने के लिए शेड्यूल तैयार किया जा रहा है और संभवत: आगामी माह से यह इंटरव्यू प्रक्रिया शुरू कर दी जाएगी।
काबिलेगौर है कि टीजीटी की तीनों श्रेणियों के तकरीबन 700 पदों को भरने का प्रोसेस वर्ष 2002 में शुरू हुआ था और सरकार बदलने के बाद यह अधर में ही लटक गया था। बाद में हाइकोर्ट के आदेश पर इनकी नियुक्ति प्रोसेस को जारी रखने का आदेश हुआ था, अब तक इस श्रेणी में नॉन मेडिकल और मेडिकल के तकरीबन 500 अभ्यर्थियों को नियुक्ति मिल चुकी है। लेकिन ऑर्ट्स ग्रुप की नियुक्ति का मामला इनके रिकॉर्ड को लेकर लटक गया था। इनका सारा रिकॉर्ड विजिलेंस ने हाइकोर्ट में जमा करवा रखा था। संबंधित रिकॉर्ड एसएसएसबी को वापस आ गया है और अब इंटरव्यू अगस्त माह में शुरू हो सकते हैं।
क्या थी वजह
टीजीटी आर्ट्स की यह नियुक्तियां इस लिए इतनी लंबित हो गई हैं, क्योंकि नॉन मेडिकल के इंटरव्यू भी हो गए थे। उन्हें केवल नियुक्ति आदेश जारी होने थे, जबकि आर्ट्स श्रेणी की केवल छंटनी प्रक्रिया का परिणाम ही निकला था, जो अभ्यर्थी पास आउट हुए थे, इंटरव्यू के लिए कॉल किया जाना था। सरकार बदलने पर 2003 में इन सारी नियुक्तियों का प्रोसेस बंद कर दिया था। तब सरकार बदलने पर एसएसएसबी में विजिलेंस का बड़ा छापा पड़ा था और लंबे समय तक यह जांच जारी रही। कांग्रेस की सरकार बदलने के बाद फिर से भाजपा की सरकार आई और पात्र अभ्यर्थियों ने हाइकोर्ट में इस दौरान याचिका दायर की थी कि उनकी नियुक्तियां की जाएं, जिस पर यह सारा प्रोसेस फिर से शुरू हुआ था। कुछ माह पहले हाइकोर्ट ने आर्ट्स श्रेणी में छंटनी प्रक्रिया में पास अभ्यर्थियों को इंटरव्यू को बुलाने के आदेश दिए थे, लेकिन बोर्ड ने इस प्रोसेस से संबंधित रिकॉर्ड उनके पास नहीं होने की बात कही थी। जिस पर विजिलेंस को पत्र लिखा गया था। विजिलेंस का संबंधित रिकॉर्ड हाईकोर्ट में होने की बात कही थी। इस प्रक्रिया में रिकॉर्ड को लेने के लिए कुछ माह लगे।
अभी क्या है असमंजस
यह नियुक्तियां अनुबंध पर होंगी या नियमित आधार पर। इस पर अभी असमंजस बनी हुई है। हालांकि पहले की नियुक्तियां स्थाई आधार पर करने के हाइकोर्ट ने आदेश दिए थे। वजह यह है कि 2002 के विज्ञापन के आधार पर इन सब नियुक्तियों को नियमित आधार पर करने की बात कही गई थी। यदि यह नियुक्तियां उसी आधार पर होती हैं, तो संबंधित अभ्यर्थियों को पेंशन सुविधा भी हासिल होगी और राज्य सरकार के अन्य पुराने कर्मचारियों की तरह तमाम सुविधाएं मिलेंगी। बोर्ड अभी अनुबंध आधार पर ही इन नियुक्तियों के प्रोसेस को पूरा करने वाला है।
बोर्ड के सचिव विनोद कुमार ने बताया कि यह नियुक्तियां अनुबंध आधार पर ही होंगी, क्योंकि पहले की नियुक्तियां भी इसी आधार पर हुई हैं जबकि बोर्ड के चेयरमैन जेके चौहान का कहना है कि इस असमंजस को लेकर सरकार को फिर से एक पत्र लिखा गया है। इसमें कहा गया है कि वर्ष 2002 की यह नियुक्तियां नियमित रूप में होने का प्रोसेस शुरू किया गया था, लेकिन अब सरकार बताए कि इन्हें किस आधार पर किया जाना है। दो -तीन दिनों में स्थिति साफ हो जाएगी, लेकिन उन्होंने बताया कि इंटरव्यू प्रोसेस शुरू करने के लिए शेड्यूल तैयार किया जा रहा है और संभवत: आगामी माह से यह इंटरव्यू प्रक्रिया शुरू कर दी जाएगी।
910,603,234,300,000 रु. भ्रष्टाचार की भेंट चढ़ गए!
ये हैं उन घोटालों का लेखा जोखा जो आजादी के बाद से अब तक लोगों के सामने आएं है। ऐसा नहीं है कि यह सूची अपने आप में अंतिम है। दरअसल ये वे घोटालें हैं जो पकड़े गए और जनता की नजर में आ सकें।
घोटालों की इस पूरी राशि को जोड़ दिया जाए तो यह 910,603,234,300,000 रूपए बैठती है जो अमेरिकन डॉलर में 20.23 खरब के बराबर है।
अगर इस राशि को भारत के कल्याण के लिए लगाया जाए तो भारत रातों-रात सुपर पावर बन जाएगा। और भारत की तमाम तरह की सामाजिक समस्याओं जैसे गरीबी,बेरोजगारी,अशिक्षा,कुपोषण आदि से आसानी से निजात पाया जा सकता है।
ऐसा भी नहीं है कि यह सूची अंतिम है बल्कि इसमें आए दिन जो नित्य नए घोटाले उजागर होते जा रहे है अगर उन्हें भी मिला दिया जाए तो हम एक बिलकुल नई बढ़ी हुई राशि पाएंगे।
घोटालों की इस पूरी राशि को जोड़ दिया जाए तो यह 910,603,234,300,000 रूपए बैठती है जो अमेरिकन डॉलर में 20.23 खरब के बराबर है।
अगर इस राशि को भारत के कल्याण के लिए लगाया जाए तो भारत रातों-रात सुपर पावर बन जाएगा। और भारत की तमाम तरह की सामाजिक समस्याओं जैसे गरीबी,बेरोजगारी,अशिक्षा,कुपोषण आदि से आसानी से निजात पाया जा सकता है।
ऐसा भी नहीं है कि यह सूची अंतिम है बल्कि इसमें आए दिन जो नित्य नए घोटाले उजागर होते जा रहे है अगर उन्हें भी मिला दिया जाए तो हम एक बिलकुल नई बढ़ी हुई राशि पाएंगे।
NOTICE DATE EXTENDED UPTO 13.07.2011
DATE EXTENDED UPTO 13.07.2011
The Department of Primary Education, Haryana
maintains database in respect of its teachers on the central
server installed at the Directorate. The transfers/ promotions/
posting orders/ adjustments on promotion as well as on new
appointments to different category posts are issued after
incorporating in the database, the relevant information.
It is, therefore, hereby informed to all teachers working
in the Department of Primary Education that they should check
their personal information on the website of the Department
www.schooleducationharyana.gov.in or www.harprathmik.gov.in
and intimate the Directorate in case there is any discrepancy in
the information placed on the website. Such intimation should be
clearly mentioned and be sent to the Directorate alongwith
relevant documents by attaching scanned copy of the relevant
document through e‐mail only at jbtdatahry@gmail.com by
13.7.2011 by 5.00 p.m. Queries received thereafter shall not be
entertained.for original notice click here
click here for district wise data of jbt/master/lecturer/c&v
NOTICE
सवा लाख शिक्षा मित्रों को शिक्षक का दर्जा देंगी माया
लखनऊ शिक्षामित्रों को बेसिक स्कूलों में स्थायी शिक्षक का दर्जा देने पर मुख्यमंत्री मायावती ने कैबिनेट की बैठक में मुहर लगा दी। फैसले के अनुसार सूबे के एक लाख 24 हजार स्नातक शिक्षा मित्रों को दूरस्थ शिक्षा के माध्यम से दो वर्षीय बीटीसी प्रशिक्षण दिया जाएगा। प्रशिक्षण के बाद शिक्षामित्र सूबे के प्राथमिक स्कूलों में बतौर शिक्षक नियुक्त होने की शैक्षिक योग्यता हासिल कर लेंगे और उनकी स्थायी नियुक्ति का रास्ता साफ हो जाएगा। शिक्षामित्रों को यह प्रशिक्षण दो चरणों में दिया जाएगा। पहला चरण 2011-13 और दूसरा 2013-15 में होगा। प्रत्येक चरण में 62,000 शिक्षामित्र प्रशिक्षित किये जाएंगे। इस संबंध में सोमवार को शासनादेश भी जारी कर दिया गया है। अंतिम परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण करने पर एससीईआरटी की ओर से उन्हें प्रमाणपत्र जारी किया जाएगा। प्रशिक्षण के दौरान शिक्षा मित्रों को स्कूलों में पढ़ाना होगा। इस बीच शिक्षा मित्रों को 3500 रुपये प्रति माह मानदेय मिलता रहेगा। शासन ने जून 2015 तक 1.24 लाख स्नातक शिक्षामित्रों को प्रशिक्षित करने का लक्ष्य तय किया है।
Chhatisgarh -शिक्षाकर्मियों को मिल सकती है बड़ी सौगात
रायपुर.राज्य के पौने दो लाख शिक्षा कर्मियों को शिक्षा विभाग में समायोजित करने के आसार बनने लगे हैं। शासन स्तर पर इसके लिए मंथन शुरु कर दिया गया है। 18 जुलाई को प्रमुख सचिव और पंचायत एवं ग्रामीण विकास विभाग की अध्यक्षता में बैठक होगी।इसमें शिक्षा कर्मियों की सभी बड़ी मांगों विचार होगा।
उच्च स्तरीय बैठक में पंचायत एवं समाज सेवा विभाग के संचालक भी शामिल रहेंगे। बैठक में शिक्षा कर्मियों का पक्ष भी सुना जाएगा।इसके लिए शिक्षा कर्मियों के तीनों संघ छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षा कर्मी संघ, शालेय शिक्षाकर्मी संघ और संयुक्त शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के पदाधिकारियों को भी आमंत्रित किया गया है। मंत्रालय में बैठक दोपहर 12 बजे शुरु होगी।
छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के बैनर तले सबसे पहले यह मांग उठायी गई। बाद में विभिन्न कारणों से शिक्षाकर्मी तीन धड़ों में बंट गए। इसके बावजूद शिक्षा कर्मियों की मांगों में कोई बदलाव नहीं आया। छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के अध्यक्ष संजय शर्मा और शालेय शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के अध्यक्ष वीरेंद्र दुबे ने बताया कि संगठन की ओर से कई बार मांग की जा चुकी है।
शासन का ध्यान अब उस ओर गया है। शासन स्तर पर की जा रही पहल के बाद अब ऐसा माना जा रहा है कि सरकार शिक्षा कर्मियों की विभिन्न लंबित मांगों को पूरा करने के संबंध में गंभीर है।इसी वजह से मंथन शुरु किया जा रहा है।
इन मुद्दों पर शासन स्तर पर होगी चर्चा
0 शिक्षा कर्मियों को शासकीय कर्मियों के समान सुविधा।
0 व्याख्याता, शिक्षक और सहायक शिक्षक के पद पर संविलियन।
0 छठवां वेतनमान का लाभ।
0 स्थानांतरण नीति।
0 अनुकंपा नियुक्ति।
0 अनुग्रह राशि।
0 समूह बीमा योजना एवं भविष्य निधि कटौती।
0 शिक्षाकर्मी वर्ग-01 की पदोन्नति क्रमोन्नति के संबंध में।
0 परिवार कल्याण कार्यक्रम के अंतर्गत विशेष वेतन वृद्धि।
0 शिक्षा कर्मियों से संबंधित परामर्श दात्री समिति का गठन।
आंदोलन की तैयारी में, धरने से शुरुआत
शिक्षा का नया सत्र शुरु होने के साथ ही शिक्षाकर्मी अपनी पूर्व लंबित मांगों को लेकर आंदोलन की तैयारी में हैं। 28 जुला ईको शालेय शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के बैनर तले सभी जिला मुख्यालयों में धरना दिया जाएगा।
संघ के अध्यक्ष श्री दुबे ने कहा कि जिला स्तरीय धरने के बाद राज्य स्तरीय आंदोलन की रूपरेखा तैयार की जाएगी।इधर, छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के पदाधिकारी भी राज्य के विभिन्न जिलों में दौरा कर रहे हैं।इसके जरिये आंदोलन की तैयारी की जा रही है।
उच्च स्तरीय बैठक में पंचायत एवं समाज सेवा विभाग के संचालक भी शामिल रहेंगे। बैठक में शिक्षा कर्मियों का पक्ष भी सुना जाएगा।इसके लिए शिक्षा कर्मियों के तीनों संघ छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षा कर्मी संघ, शालेय शिक्षाकर्मी संघ और संयुक्त शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के पदाधिकारियों को भी आमंत्रित किया गया है। मंत्रालय में बैठक दोपहर 12 बजे शुरु होगी।
छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के बैनर तले सबसे पहले यह मांग उठायी गई। बाद में विभिन्न कारणों से शिक्षाकर्मी तीन धड़ों में बंट गए। इसके बावजूद शिक्षा कर्मियों की मांगों में कोई बदलाव नहीं आया। छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के अध्यक्ष संजय शर्मा और शालेय शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के अध्यक्ष वीरेंद्र दुबे ने बताया कि संगठन की ओर से कई बार मांग की जा चुकी है।
शासन का ध्यान अब उस ओर गया है। शासन स्तर पर की जा रही पहल के बाद अब ऐसा माना जा रहा है कि सरकार शिक्षा कर्मियों की विभिन्न लंबित मांगों को पूरा करने के संबंध में गंभीर है।इसी वजह से मंथन शुरु किया जा रहा है।
इन मुद्दों पर शासन स्तर पर होगी चर्चा
0 शिक्षा कर्मियों को शासकीय कर्मियों के समान सुविधा।
0 व्याख्याता, शिक्षक और सहायक शिक्षक के पद पर संविलियन।
0 छठवां वेतनमान का लाभ।
0 स्थानांतरण नीति।
0 अनुकंपा नियुक्ति।
0 अनुग्रह राशि।
0 समूह बीमा योजना एवं भविष्य निधि कटौती।
0 शिक्षाकर्मी वर्ग-01 की पदोन्नति क्रमोन्नति के संबंध में।
0 परिवार कल्याण कार्यक्रम के अंतर्गत विशेष वेतन वृद्धि।
0 शिक्षा कर्मियों से संबंधित परामर्श दात्री समिति का गठन।
आंदोलन की तैयारी में, धरने से शुरुआत
शिक्षा का नया सत्र शुरु होने के साथ ही शिक्षाकर्मी अपनी पूर्व लंबित मांगों को लेकर आंदोलन की तैयारी में हैं। 28 जुला ईको शालेय शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के बैनर तले सभी जिला मुख्यालयों में धरना दिया जाएगा।
संघ के अध्यक्ष श्री दुबे ने कहा कि जिला स्तरीय धरने के बाद राज्य स्तरीय आंदोलन की रूपरेखा तैयार की जाएगी।इधर, छत्तीसगढ़ शिक्षाकर्मी संघ के पदाधिकारी भी राज्य के विभिन्न जिलों में दौरा कर रहे हैं।इसके जरिये आंदोलन की तैयारी की जा रही है।
शिमला में स्कूली छुट्टियों का शेड्यूल जारी
शिमला . प्रदेश सरकार ने 31 मार्च, 2012 तक स्कूली छुट्टियों का शेड्यूल जारी कर दिया गया है। यह शेड्यूल ग्रीष्म व शरदकालीन दोनों स्तर के स्कूलों के लिए जारी कर दिया गया है। यह अवकाश शेड्यूल 52 दिनों का है। ग्रीष्म कालीन स्कूलों में कुल्लू व लाहौल-स्पीति के लिए मानसून ब्रेक 20 जुलाई से 10 अगस्त तक 22 दिन का होगा।
दीवाली के दौरान छह दिन की फेस्टिवल ब्रेक (दीवाली से एक दिन पहले) व एक जनवरी से 24 जनवरी तक 24 दिन की विंटर ब्रेक होगी। कुल्लू जिला के लिए 22 दिन की मानसून ब्रेक 20 जुलाई से दस अगस्त, दशहरा के दौरान छह दिन की फेस्टिवल ब्रेक (दशहरा से एक दिन पहले) व एक जनवरी से 24 जनवरी तक 24 दिन की विंटर ब्रेक होगी। लाहौल-स्पीति जिला के लिए 17 जुलाई से 27 अगस्त तक 42 दिन की समर ब्रेक व दस दिन की दशहरा ब्रेक होगी।
(दशहरा से एक दिन पहले) होगी।
शरदकालीन स्कूलों के लिए मानसून ब्रेक 27 जुलाई से दस अगस्त तक 15 दिन की होगी। दीवाली से चार दिन पहले से छह दिन की फेस्टिवल ब्रेक और एक जनवरी से 31 जनवरी तक 31 दिन की विंटर ब्रेक होगी।
उन्होंने कहा कि इस दूषित पानी की मार से फसलों पर ही नहीं बल्कि यहां के लोगों को भी पेट की बीमारियों का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
उन्होंने प्रशासन से इस रसायनुक्त पानी को दरिया में डालने पर रोक लगाने का आग्रह किया है। लोगों ने चेताया है कि अगर इस मामले को गंभीरता से नहीं लिया गया तो वे आंदोलन करने पर विवश होंगे। इस मौके पर पूर्व सरपंच ओमप्रकाश, गुरमेल सिंह, गुरदेव सिंह, जसवीर सिंह, कर्मचंद, राकेश कुमार, फकीर चंद, जोगिंद्र सिंह, हरीकिशन, रामदास, रणजीत सिंह, दिलबाग सिंह, दरबार सिंह सहित दर्जनों लोग उपस्थित थे।
दीवाली के दौरान छह दिन की फेस्टिवल ब्रेक (दीवाली से एक दिन पहले) व एक जनवरी से 24 जनवरी तक 24 दिन की विंटर ब्रेक होगी। कुल्लू जिला के लिए 22 दिन की मानसून ब्रेक 20 जुलाई से दस अगस्त, दशहरा के दौरान छह दिन की फेस्टिवल ब्रेक (दशहरा से एक दिन पहले) व एक जनवरी से 24 जनवरी तक 24 दिन की विंटर ब्रेक होगी। लाहौल-स्पीति जिला के लिए 17 जुलाई से 27 अगस्त तक 42 दिन की समर ब्रेक व दस दिन की दशहरा ब्रेक होगी।
(दशहरा से एक दिन पहले) होगी।
शरदकालीन स्कूलों के लिए मानसून ब्रेक 27 जुलाई से दस अगस्त तक 15 दिन की होगी। दीवाली से चार दिन पहले से छह दिन की फेस्टिवल ब्रेक और एक जनवरी से 31 जनवरी तक 31 दिन की विंटर ब्रेक होगी।
उन्होंने कहा कि इस दूषित पानी की मार से फसलों पर ही नहीं बल्कि यहां के लोगों को भी पेट की बीमारियों का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
उन्होंने प्रशासन से इस रसायनुक्त पानी को दरिया में डालने पर रोक लगाने का आग्रह किया है। लोगों ने चेताया है कि अगर इस मामले को गंभीरता से नहीं लिया गया तो वे आंदोलन करने पर विवश होंगे। इस मौके पर पूर्व सरपंच ओमप्रकाश, गुरमेल सिंह, गुरदेव सिंह, जसवीर सिंह, कर्मचंद, राकेश कुमार, फकीर चंद, जोगिंद्र सिंह, हरीकिशन, रामदास, रणजीत सिंह, दिलबाग सिंह, दरबार सिंह सहित दर्जनों लोग उपस्थित थे।
अंग्रेजी में फेल भी बन गए अंग्रेजी के वरिष्ठ अध्यापक
आरपीएससी की ओर से आयोजित सेकंड ग्रेड शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा 2008 के अंग्रेजी के परिणाम की मुख्यमंत्री को शिकायत
जयपुर। राजस्थान लोक सेवा आयोग की ओर से आयोजित सेकंड ग्रेड शिक्षक भर्ती 2008 में अंग्रेजी विषय के परिणाम की विसंगति की सोमवार को कई अभ्यर्थियों ने मुख्यमंत्री से शिकायत की। अभ्यर्थियों ने मुख्यमंत्री को दिए ज्ञापन में कहा कि कई ऐसे अभ्यर्थी अंग्रेजी के वरिष्ठ अध्यापक (सेकंड ग्रेड शिक्षक) के लिए चयनित हो गए, जो अंग्रेजी विषय के पेपर में फेल हो गए थे।
मालवीय नगर निवासी राहुल पालीवाल ने बताया कि परिणाम में सामान्य ज्ञान के अंक जोड़े गए जो गलत है। ज्यादातर चयनित अभ्यर्थी सामान्य ज्ञान के पेपर में तो अच्छे अंक ले आए, लेकिन वे अंग्रेजी के पेपर में फेल थे। पालीवाल ने बताया कि अंग्रेजी के पेपर में अच्छे अंक लाने वाले परीक्षा में चयनित नहीं हो सके, क्योंकि उनके सामान्य ज्ञान में अच्छे अंक नहीं आ पाए।
उन्होंने मुख्यमंत्री से मांग की कि इस बात की समीक्षा की जो कि जिस विषय के लिए परीक्षा हुई थी, उसमेंं अच्छे अंक नहीं लाने वाले विषय को कैसे पढ़ाएंगे। परीक्षा के नियमों में भी कुछ ऐसा संशोधन किया जाए, जिससे जिस विषय की भर्ती परीक्षा है, उस विषय में अच्छे अंक लाने वालों को फायदा मिले।
Eligibility for House Building Advance – Joint ownership of Plot/House by a Govt. employees and his/her spouse
No. 2/2/93-WM(1)
From
The Financial Commissioner & Secretary to Government,
Haryana, Finance Department.
To
All Heads of Departments;
All Commissioners of Ambala, Gurgaon,
Hissar and Rohtak Divisions and
All Deputy Commissioners and
Sub Divisional Officers (C) in Haryana.
The Registrar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
All District & Session Judges, in Haryana.
Dated, Chandigarh, the 8th September, 1993
Subject : Eligibility for House Building Advance – Joint ownership of Plot/House by a
Govt. employees and his/her spouse.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the Finance Department’s letter No. 2/19/92-WM(1) dated
17th July, 1992 on the subject noted above and to say that the policy in this regard, as
formulated in that letter was that in case where both husband and wife are State Govt.
employees and are eligible for the grant of House Building Advance under the rules, it would be
admissible only to one of them for jointly owned plot/house. However, the House Building
Advance would be admissible to both individually and separately, on a separate plot/ house.
This matter has been reconsidered by the Government and it has now been decided
that House Building Advance may be allowed separately to both husband and wife on a jointly
owned plot/house subject to the condition that they do not own a house/plot earlier, provided
they are both State Government employees and are otherwise eligible for the same under the
rules.
2. The other conditions as laid down in the rules/instructions issued by the Finance
Department from time to time remain unchanged.
3. This may please be brought to the notice of all the dealing officials/Officers working
under your control for strict compliance.
Please acknowledge receipt.
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
Deputy Secretary Finance (B)
for Financial Commissioner & Secy. to Govt.,
Haryana, Finance Department.
***************
-----------------------------------------------------------
These instructions have been Revised Vide
No. 2/19/81-WM(1), Dated 17.7.1992 &
No. 2/2/93-WM(I), Dated 08.09.1993.
No. 2/19/81-WM(1)
From
The Secretary to Government, Haryana,
Finance Department.
To
All Heads of Departments,
Commissioners of Ambala & Hissar Divisions,
All Deputy Commissioners &
Sub Divisional Officers(s) in Haryana.
The Registrar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh,
All District & Session Judges in Haryana.
Dated, Chandigarh, the 26th March, 1981
Subject : Eligibility for House Building Advance – Joint ownership of plot/house by a
Government servant and his/her wife/husband.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to Finance Department Letter No. 1726-WM(1)-74/10958,
dated the 29th March, 1974, on the above subject communicating the decision of the
Government that in case both the husband and wife are Government employees and are
eligible for the grant of house building advance under the rules on the subject, it shall be
admissible to only one of them for the jointly owned plot/house.
2. The matter has been reconsidered by the Government, and it has been decided that
the house building advance may be allowed to both husband and wife, if they are Government
employees and are eligible for the same under the rules on the subject individually and severely
on a jointly owned plot/house or separate plot/house, as per their admissibility. In that event it
has to be ensured that the amount has been spent and the plot and the structure thereon have
been jointly or individually mortgaged by the Government employees.
3. The other conditions as laid down in the rules/instructions issued by the Finance
Department from time to time remain unchanged.
Sd/-
Under Secretary Finance (B),
for Secretary to Government, Haryana,
Finance Department.
No. 2/19/81-WM(1) Dated Chandigarh, the 26-3-1981
-----------------------------------------------------
These instructions were superseded vide
No.12669-(1)/WM-77/35145 Dated 14.12.1927.
Copy of Haryana Govt. letter No. 2266-WM(I)-69/13313 dated 26th May, 1969.—
The undersigned is directed to state that under the rules to regulate the grant of
advances to Government servants for the building etc. of houses, an advance is at present,
admissible only if the applicant himself possesses a clear and marketable title to the
land/house. It has now been decided that a House Building Advance may also be granted to a
Government Servant who owns the land house jointly with his/her wife/husband, if otherwise
admissible provided both the husband and wife are willing to mortgage the land/house in favour
of the Governor of Haryana as security for repayment of the advance.
2. The application for the grant of House Building Advance, in such cases, should be
accompanied by a letter from the wife or husband (as the case may be) that if the loan applied
for is sanctioned, the wife/husband will mortgage her/his share of the land property jointly with
her husband/his wife as security for payment of the advance.
***************
From
The Financial Commissioner & Secretary to Government,
Haryana, Finance Department.
To
All Heads of Departments;
All Commissioners of Ambala, Gurgaon,
Hissar and Rohtak Divisions and
All Deputy Commissioners and
Sub Divisional Officers (C) in Haryana.
The Registrar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
All District & Session Judges, in Haryana.
Dated, Chandigarh, the 8th September, 1993
Subject : Eligibility for House Building Advance – Joint ownership of Plot/House by a
Govt. employees and his/her spouse.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the Finance Department’s letter No. 2/19/92-WM(1) dated
17th July, 1992 on the subject noted above and to say that the policy in this regard, as
formulated in that letter was that in case where both husband and wife are State Govt.
employees and are eligible for the grant of House Building Advance under the rules, it would be
admissible only to one of them for jointly owned plot/house. However, the House Building
Advance would be admissible to both individually and separately, on a separate plot/ house.
This matter has been reconsidered by the Government and it has now been decided
that House Building Advance may be allowed separately to both husband and wife on a jointly
owned plot/house subject to the condition that they do not own a house/plot earlier, provided
they are both State Government employees and are otherwise eligible for the same under the
rules.
2. The other conditions as laid down in the rules/instructions issued by the Finance
Department from time to time remain unchanged.
3. This may please be brought to the notice of all the dealing officials/Officers working
under your control for strict compliance.
Please acknowledge receipt.
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
Deputy Secretary Finance (B)
for Financial Commissioner & Secy. to Govt.,
Haryana, Finance Department.
***************
-----------------------------------------------------------
These instructions have been Revised Vide
No. 2/19/81-WM(1), Dated 17.7.1992 &
No. 2/2/93-WM(I), Dated 08.09.1993.
No. 2/19/81-WM(1)
From
The Secretary to Government, Haryana,
Finance Department.
To
All Heads of Departments,
Commissioners of Ambala & Hissar Divisions,
All Deputy Commissioners &
Sub Divisional Officers(s) in Haryana.
The Registrar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh,
All District & Session Judges in Haryana.
Dated, Chandigarh, the 26th March, 1981
Subject : Eligibility for House Building Advance – Joint ownership of plot/house by a
Government servant and his/her wife/husband.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to Finance Department Letter No. 1726-WM(1)-74/10958,
dated the 29th March, 1974, on the above subject communicating the decision of the
Government that in case both the husband and wife are Government employees and are
eligible for the grant of house building advance under the rules on the subject, it shall be
admissible to only one of them for the jointly owned plot/house.
2. The matter has been reconsidered by the Government, and it has been decided that
the house building advance may be allowed to both husband and wife, if they are Government
employees and are eligible for the same under the rules on the subject individually and severely
on a jointly owned plot/house or separate plot/house, as per their admissibility. In that event it
has to be ensured that the amount has been spent and the plot and the structure thereon have
been jointly or individually mortgaged by the Government employees.
3. The other conditions as laid down in the rules/instructions issued by the Finance
Department from time to time remain unchanged.
Sd/-
Under Secretary Finance (B),
for Secretary to Government, Haryana,
Finance Department.
No. 2/19/81-WM(1) Dated Chandigarh, the 26-3-1981
-----------------------------------------------------
These instructions were superseded vide
No.12669-(1)/WM-77/35145 Dated 14.12.1927.
Copy of Haryana Govt. letter No. 2266-WM(I)-69/13313 dated 26th May, 1969.—
The undersigned is directed to state that under the rules to regulate the grant of
advances to Government servants for the building etc. of houses, an advance is at present,
admissible only if the applicant himself possesses a clear and marketable title to the
land/house. It has now been decided that a House Building Advance may also be granted to a
Government Servant who owns the land house jointly with his/her wife/husband, if otherwise
admissible provided both the husband and wife are willing to mortgage the land/house in favour
of the Governor of Haryana as security for repayment of the advance.
2. The application for the grant of House Building Advance, in such cases, should be
accompanied by a letter from the wife or husband (as the case may be) that if the loan applied
for is sanctioned, the wife/husband will mortgage her/his share of the land property jointly with
her husband/his wife as security for payment of the advance.
***************
HBSE current status
for detail click here
JBT Data on DSE/ www.harprathmik.gov.in site
yadi aap k diye gaye data me koi galti ho to 11.7.2011 5PM tak
jbtdatahry@gmail.com
pr email kare
1. to see JBT/HT/master/lect data click here
to see jbt data click here
jbtdatahry@gmail.com
pr email kare
1. to see JBT/HT/master/lect data click here
to see jbt data click here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)